Enforcement actionPendingAllegations, not findingsFederalUtahCalifornia

FTC and two states sue Hims and Hers over charge at intake subscriptions, hidden cancellation and health data sharing

A July 29, 2026 complaint by the FTC, Utah and California alleges customers were charged and enrolled in recurring prescription plans right after an intake form, that cancellation was hidden, and that health data went to Meta and Snap. The company denies it, and nothing is decided.

Source Jul 29, 2026Briefing Sep 21, 2026Reviewed Sep 21, 2026Next review Jan 31, 2027
01What changed

The complaint, filed in the Northern District of California on a 2 to 0 Commission vote, alleges Hims and Hers promised a provider consultation, took billing details with assurances of no charge until a prescription, then enrolled most consumers in a recurring subscription shortly after the intake form without a consultation or a chance to approve the treatment. It alleges refill timing was not clearly disclosed and the online cancel button was hidden behind several steps.

It further alleges that sensitive health information was shared with advertising platforms including Meta and Snap through customer lists and website tracking, despite privacy promises. Claims are under the FTC Act, the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act, Utah's Consumer Sales Practices Act and California's false advertising and unfair competition laws. These are allegations in a pending case.

02Who this affects
  • Telehealth platforms billing recurring prescription subscriptions from an intake form.
  • Pharmacies that fulfil those subscriptions and appear on the card statement.
  • Any pharmacy site running advertising pixels on pages where patients enter health information.

A complaint against one company. The legal theories, under the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act, apply to any subscription checkout.

03Key dates
Source publishedJuly 29, 2026Complaint filed in the Northern District of California; FTC press release.
04Why it matters

The same checkout that draws a consumer protection complaint draws card network disputes, and a dispute program does not distinguish the platform that built the funnel from the pharmacy that filled the order. Charge at intake, an undisclosed refill cycle and a buried cancel path are the pattern on both sides.

05What to do now
  1. Walk through your own or your partner's checkout and confirm the charge, the refill cycle and the cancel path are shown before any card is charged.
  2. Provide a one step online cancellation for any recurring program.
  3. Audit which third party tags fire on pages where a patient enters a condition or medication.
06How this relates to certification

Payment and Compliance History. The Payment and Compliance History domain reviews dispute history and regulatory actions. Subscription billing disputes and consumer protection complaints are inputs to that review.

07Sources
All briefingsRevision 2783c18ae26a

Know where your pharmacy stands before the rules change again.

Certified pharmacies are re-verified nightly against state boards, federal enforcement records and their own websites.

Back to Regulatory Watch